Compare ESET Dynamic Threat Defense vs. FireEye Network Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: April 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The pricing, if compared to other products, is cheap."

More ESET Dynamic Threat Defense Pros »

"Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams.""The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money.""If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution.""The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email.""The server appliance is good.""The most valuable feature is the network security module.""It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

More FireEye Network Security Pros »

Cons
"The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product."

More ESET Dynamic Threat Defense Cons »

"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard.""As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web).""It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment.""It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto.""Technical packaging could be improved.""It is very expensive, the price could be better.""I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."

More FireEye Network Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market.""When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive.""The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive.""It's an expensive solution."

More FireEye Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities.
Top Answer: I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most… more »
Ranking
Views
331
Comparisons
119
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
432
Rating
9.0
Views
7,407
Comparisons
4,965
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
390
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
FireEye
Learn More
Overview

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense provides another layer of security for ESET products like Mail Security and endpoint products by utilizing a cloud-based sandboxing technology to detect new, never before seen types of threats.

FireEye Network Security is an advanced threat protection and breach detection platform that provides industry leading threat visibility and protection against the world’s most sophisticated and damaging attacks. By leveraging FireEye’s unique technologies and threat intelligence, FireEye Network Security detects what other security solutions miss, providing holistic security from the perimeter to the network core.

Offer
Learn more about ESET Dynamic Threat Defense
Learn more about FireEye Network Security
Sample Customers
Mitsubishi Motors, Allianz Suisse, Canon, T-Mobile
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
University15%
Manufacturing Company15%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: April 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is ranked 12th in Advanced Threat Protection with 1 review while FireEye Network Security is ranked 4th in Advanced Threat Protection with 7 reviews. ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is rated 9.0, while FireEye Network Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ESET Dynamic Threat Defense writes "Good pricing, an easy installation process and excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FireEye Network Security writes "Stable, protective, easy to set up, and has a lot of features to scan vulnerabilities". ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is most compared with Fortinet FortiEDR and Kaspersky Sandbox, whereas FireEye Network Security is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Stealthwatch, Check Point SandBlast Network and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.