Compare ESET Dynamic Threat Defense vs. McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
Use ESET Dynamic Threat Defense? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The pricing, if compared to other products, is cheap."
"It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business."
"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."
"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."
Cons
"The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product."
"This solution needs to be made "cloud ready"."
"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."
"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."
Information Not Available
"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."
More McAfee Advanced Threat Defense Pricing and Cost Advice »
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server.
Top Answer: Costing is competitive now that Symantec has almost stepped out of this arena the completion has changed with other players coming up.
Top Answer: Make the ATD appliance a part of the whole product offering and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version. McAfee sells the… more »
Views
331
Comparisons
119
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
432
Rating
9.0
Views
589
Comparisons
284
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
318
Rating
7.7
Compared 69% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 45% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
ESET Dynamic Threat Defense provides another layer of security for ESET products like Mail Security and endpoint products by utilizing a cloud-based sandboxing technology to detect new, never before seen types of threats.
McAfee Advanced Threat Defense enables organizations to detect advanced, evasive malware and convert threat information into immediate action and protection. Unlike traditional sandboxes, it includes additional inspection capabilities that broaden detection and expose evasive threats. Tight integration between security solutions - from network and endpoint to investigation - enables instant sharing of threat information across the environment, enhancing protection and investigation. Flexible deployment options support every network.
Learn more about ESET Dynamic Threat Defense
Learn more about McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
Mitsubishi Motors, Allianz Suisse, Canon, T-Mobile
The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust
No Data Available
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government8%
Educational Organization7%
No Data Available
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, RSA, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is ranked 12th in Advanced Threat Protection with 1 review while McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is ranked 14th in Advanced Threat Protection with 3 reviews. ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is rated 9.0, while McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ESET Dynamic Threat Defense writes "Good pricing, an easy installation process and excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Advanced Threat Defense writes "Can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients". ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is most compared with Fortinet FortiEDR and Kaspersky Sandbox, whereas McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, FireEye Network Security, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and Check Point SandBlast Network.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.