Compare ESET Dynamic Threat Defense vs. McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is ranked 11th in Advanced Threat Protection with 1 review while McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is ranked 12th in Advanced Threat Protection with 4 reviews. ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is rated 9.0, while McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ESET Dynamic Threat Defense writes "Good pricing, an easy installation process and excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Advanced Threat Defense writes "Protects the endpoints of our organization but it is not cloud ready". ESET Dynamic Threat Defense is most compared with FortiEDR, whereas McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox and SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use ESET Dynamic Threat Defense? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The pricing, if compared to other products, is cheap.

Read more »

The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module.It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business.It is very scalable.

Read more »

Cons
The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product.

Read more »

I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology.This solution needs to be made "cloud ready".The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year.The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
149
Comparisons
46
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
432
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
291
Comparisons
84
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
241
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Learn
ESET
McAfee
Overview

ESET Dynamic Threat Defense provides another layer of security for ESET products like Mail Security and endpoint products by utilizing a cloud-based sandboxing technology to detect new, never before seen types of threats.

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense enables organizations to detect advanced, evasive malware and convert threat information into immediate action and protection. Unlike traditional sandboxes, it includes additional inspection capabilities that broaden detection and expose evasive threats. Tight integration between security solutions - from network and endpoint to investigation - enables instant sharing of threat information across the environment, enhancing protection and investigation. Flexible deployment options support every network.

Offer
Learn more about ESET Dynamic Threat Defense
Learn more about McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.