We performed a comparison between ESET EDR/XDR and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"Scalable and stable."
"The solution could improve how it scours each website."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
"The stability could improve."
ESET EDR/XDR is ranked 36th in Authentication Systems with 1 review while Thales Authenticators is ranked 17th in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews. ESET EDR/XDR is rated 0.0, while Thales Authenticators is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ESET EDR/XDR writes "An easy-to-use solution that could improve it’s website-scouring capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales Authenticators writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". ESET EDR/XDR is most compared with Wazuh, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Microsoft Defender XDR and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas Thales Authenticators is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Atalla Hardware Security Module and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.