EVAM Event Stream Processing (ESP) Platform vs IBM Streams comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between EVAM Event Stream Processing (ESP) Platform and IBM Streams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics.
To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use EVAM Event Stream Processing (ESP) Platform?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution’s licenses pricing is different from one region to another region. I rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten.
Top Answer:the limited number of connectors. This shall be overcome with work-arounds or eventually buying additional connectors to complete the solution.
Top Answer:We use the solution for data pipeline by modernizing the traditional ETL jobs done through advanced streaming. Another use case is building the g2g streaming platform, which facilitates data exchange… more »
Ranking
32nd
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
100
Comparisons
73
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
674
Comparisons
593
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
447
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM InfoSphere Streams
Learn More
EVAM
Video Not Available
Overview

EVAM is a real-time Event Stream Processing (ESP) Platform having real-time data integration and streaming advanced analytics with Machine Learning/AI and Microservice enabled capabilities.

IBM Streams is an advanced analytic platform that allows user-developed applications to quickly ingest, analyze and correlate information as it arrives from thousands of data stream sources. The solution can handle very high data throughput rates, up to millions of events or messages per second. Streams helps you analyze data in motion, simplify development of streaming applications, and extend the value of existing systems.
Sample Customers
NA
Globo TV, All England Lawn Tennis Club, CenterPoint Energy, Consolidated Communications Holdings, Darwin Ecosystem, Emory University Hospital, ICICI Securities, Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Living Roads, Mobileum, Optibus, Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform (SOSCIP), University of Alberta, University of Montana, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Wimbledon 2015
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company15%
Comms Service Provider6%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
Streaming Analytics
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

EVAM Event Stream Processing (ESP) Platform is ranked 32nd in Streaming Analytics while IBM Streams is ranked 15th in Streaming Analytics with 5 reviews. EVAM Event Stream Processing (ESP) Platform is rated 0.0, while IBM Streams is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Streams writes "A solution for data pipelines but has connector limitations". EVAM Event Stream Processing (ESP) Platform is most compared with , whereas IBM Streams is most compared with Confluent, Azure Stream Analytics, Apache Flink, Apache Spark and Apache NiFi.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.