Evanios vs LiveAction LiveNX comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Evanios Logo
195 views|140 comparisons
LiveAction Logo
728 views|555 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Evanios and LiveAction LiveNX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want.""Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools.""The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."

More Evanios Pros →

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services.""We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive.""One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN.""The product has a very good graphical interface.""The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points.""The intention and the idea of the filter is great.""Its analytical capability is really good."

More LiveAction LiveNX Pros →

Cons
"The price could be cheaper.""We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed.""More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."

More Evanios Cons →

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster.""This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved.""They need to create a more simplified UI.""The only downside to this software is the price.""The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously.""It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive.""Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

More LiveAction LiveNX Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's very expensive."
  • "The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."
  • "We use the free version."
  • More LiveAction LiveNX Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops.
    Top Answer:The price could be cheaper. That was one reason why we switched to PagerDuty. We wanted to switch to something that provided the same features but at a lower cost. We also switched because PagerDuty… more »
    Top Answer:The solution ingests events that are generated by monitoring, and it creates incidents in ServiceNow using those events. Monitoring tools like New Relic feed the alerts into Evanios. Evanios then… more »
    Top Answer:The product has a very good graphical interface.
    Top Answer:The product must add proactive alert features.
    Top Answer:Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on a… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    195
    Comparisons
    140
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    583
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    728
    Comparisons
    555
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    631
    Rating
    6.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LiveNX
    Learn More
    LiveAction
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.

    Reduce the noise

    Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.

    LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

    Sample Customers
    Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca
    Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Large Enterprise100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Evanios is ranked 52nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 6 reviews while LiveAction LiveNX is ranked 53rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 7 reviews. Evanios is rated 9.6, while LiveAction LiveNX is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Evanios writes "The vendor is willing to work with us and develop solutions for products they did not already have an integration for". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LiveAction LiveNX writes "Greta visual analytics and real-time monitoring but requires better documentation". Evanios is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas LiveAction LiveNX is most compared with ThousandEyes, SolarWinds NPM, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, OmniPeek and NETSCOUT nGeniusONE.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.