We performed a comparison between Everteam and IBM FileNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.Earn 20 points
Everteam is ranked 30th in Enterprise Content Management while IBM FileNet is ranked 5th in Enterprise Content Management with 94 reviews. Everteam is rated 0.0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". Everteam is most compared with , whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
1. IBM platform requires SME for the broad platform.
2. The cost can be a challenge for the IBM platform.
I am interested to know more about all the products as mentioned below, but I am not an expert to discuss and compare.
We don't have any experience with Ever Team but as far as I know, you need to take into consideration what the feature is that must be in your ECM solution.
FileNet is a stable high volume system but as long as you add more features, you can run into a performance issue. You can ingest a huge amount of DOC via ICC (IBM Content Collector ). You can spread your installation with different repositories across your region. You can easily scale up your system. The new version is CONTAINER KUBERNTES DOCKER.
Textual search and analytics are not so flexible so it will be hard to compare between those 2 softwares.
Are you going to use BPM? Did you compere IBM BOW 19 VS Ever Team?