Everteam vs IBM FileNet comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Everteam Logo
90 views|53 comparisons
IBM Logo
4,953 views|2,995 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Everteam and IBM FileNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: What is the biggest difference between IBM FileNet and EverTeam?
Answer: If you are comparing the products, then it's important to look into your requirements outside the product. From the comparison point of view, we have worked with EverTeam which is SharePoint based and FileNet. FileNet is a much-matured product and can be compared to Opentext, Documentum (now OT), as it has a complete gamete of information management (Do you actually require all of it? that you have to identify internally), and its heavy on budget. Whereas EverTeam can be compared to Omnidocs or Laserfiche which has all the required functionalities of Document Management, CMS but I am doubtful on their DAM capabilities. But most important is your requirement/scope, if it is clear, than any vendor will be able to address the same provided they have a competent implementation team.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The biggest issue is the cost of the FileNet, because the license cost is very high. If a customer doesn't have good technical guides that are aware of the license calculation, they will pay too much. FileNet's license calculation depends on the processor and number of users. So my advice to a new customer is to be very careful with your calculations before purchasing FileNet."
  • "It is still a leading ECM solution provider, however the cost to implement and maintain are higher than other solutions."
  • "FileNet is not cheap, but you absolutely get what you pay for. ​"
  • "For small scale industries, they allow different options. They can do open source. It is the complexity of the data security that they should think about before they choose."
  • "For the medium scale or large scale, I would recommend FileNet. FileNet is free of licensing expenses, thus good for the money. It is not expensive, but worth for the money, especially for medium scale and large scale industries."
  • "​There are lots of components to the product. Make sure before you invest that you know which components you need.​​"
  • "1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."
  • "The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year."
  • More IBM FileNet Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Sad Dsa
    Gordon Summers - PeerSpot reviewerGordon Summers
    User

    1. IBM platform requires SME for the broad platform.
    2. The cost can be a challenge for the IBM platform.

    Geert De Wispelaere - PeerSpot reviewerGeert De Wispelaere
    User

    I am interested to know more about all the products as mentioned below, but I am not an expert to discuss and compare.

    Moshe Elbaz - PeerSpot reviewerMoshe Elbaz
    Real User

    We don't have any experience with Ever Team but as far as I know, you need to take into consideration what the feature is that must be in your ECM solution.

    FileNet is a stable high volume system but as long as you add more features, you can run into a performance issue. You can ingest a huge amount of DOC via ICC (IBM Content Collector ). You can spread your installation with different repositories across your region. You can easily scale up your system. The new version is CONTAINER KUBERNTES DOCKER.

    Textual search and analytics are not so flexible so it will be hard to compare between those 2 softwares.

    Are you going to use BPM? Did you compere IBM BOW 19 VS Ever Team?

    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. The price was 30% higher than what we needed to pay for IBM. I rate the product’s pricing a ten out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:The user interface of IBM content management, including the ability to customize screens without the need for coding, could be improved. Customers can use it to split the screen, enhancing its… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    90
    Comparisons
    53
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    4,953
    Comparisons
    2,995
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    408
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ever Team
    Learn More
    Overview
    EVER TEAM's Enterprise Content Management (ECM) product offering for 2011 is based on the Content, Case and Compliance trilogy, delivering a wide range of ECM solutions on top of three core engines, companion solutions and extensions.

    IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

    There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

    Sample Customers
    MAIF, Mutualit_ Sociale Agricole, Qatar General Insurance, SMI Mutual Insurance, ODDO&CIE, Qatar National Bank, SGBL, Jeddah Municipality, Lebanese General Security, Ministry of Higher Education, National Institute of Statistics, National Water Company, Office of The Prime Minister, Al Fardan, Mango, Tatex, Najran University, University of Barcelona, University of Hikmeh
    Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Insurance Company16%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Everteam is ranked 30th in Enterprise Content Management while IBM FileNet is ranked 5th in Enterprise Content Management with 94 reviews. Everteam is rated 0.0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". Everteam is most compared with , whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Alfresco.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.