Everteam vs Hyland Perceptive Content comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Everteam Logo
90 views|53 comparisons
Hyland Logo
176 views|133 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Everteam and Hyland Perceptive Content based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
90
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
176
Comparisons
133
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Ever Team
ImageNow
Learn More
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview
EVER TEAM's Enterprise Content Management (ECM) product offering for 2011 is based on the Content, Case and Compliance trilogy, delivering a wide range of ECM solutions on top of three core engines, companion solutions and extensions.

Perceptive Content is a scalable content services platform that manages the entire content lifecycle, from capture to disposition. Flexible functionality across multiple business applications, integration with virtually any business application and a simple-to-use interface help Perceptive Content transform internal processes and the customer experience. Perceptive Content helps users work smarter by surfacing content in context with other relevant business information. Digital documents can be viewed simultaneously, which promotes enhanced collaboration and communication among employees, customers and vendors. Locating relevant documents in the context of a business process increases customer satisfaction and employee productivity. Automated lifecycle management helps organizations comply with their records and retention policies, which reduces the risk of compliance violations and resulting fees and fines.

Sample Customers
MAIF, Mutualit_ Sociale Agricole, Qatar General Insurance, SMI Mutual Insurance, ODDO&CIE, Qatar National Bank, SGBL, Jeddah Municipality, Lebanese General Security, Ministry of Higher Education, National Institute of Statistics, National Water Company, Office of The Prime Minister, Al Fardan, Mango, Tatex, Najran University, University of Barcelona, University of Hikmeh
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
University19%
Government18%
Computer Software Company9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Everteam is ranked 30th in Enterprise Content Management while Hyland Perceptive Content is ranked 12th in Document Management Software. Everteam is rated 0.0, while Hyland Perceptive Content is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hyland Perceptive Content writes "With workflows, a group of people can be working on appeals and forward them all to one queue". Everteam is most compared with , whereas Hyland Perceptive Content is most compared with Hyland OnBase, Box, Alfresco and SharePoint.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.