• Home
  • Everteam vs. Saperion

Everteam vs Saperion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Everteam Logo

Everteam

90 views|53 comparisons
Hyland Logo

Saperion

Read 1 Saperion review
321 views|200 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Everteam and Saperion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Everteam?
Anonymous User
I would like to see improvements in the web client and the workflow engine.
The product allowed organizations to move and accelerate their paper-based business flows into electronic ones. The SAP integration is always very... Read more →
Ranking
30th
out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
Views
90
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
Views
321
Comparisons
200
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Ever Team
Hyland Saperion, Hyland Saperion ECM, Saperion ECM
Learn More
Everteam
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview
EVER TEAM's Enterprise Content Management (ECM) product offering for 2011 is based on the Content, Case and Compliance trilogy, delivering a wide range of ECM solutions on top of three core engines, companion solutions and extensions.

Saperion ECM helps you improve efficiency and fulfill compliance requirements — even when managing information trapped in unstructured documents such as invoices and emails.  Saperion automates document capture, processing, management and archiving, and allows immediate content retrieval throughout the enterprise.  It supports legal, operational and regulatory requirements. Security permissions ensure that only authorized users access the information they need.  Saperion enables seamless application integrations to help you adapt to ever-changing business needs.

Sample Customers
MAIF, Mutualit_ Sociale Agricole, Qatar General Insurance, SMI Mutual Insurance, ODDO&CIE, Qatar National Bank, SGBL, Jeddah Municipality, Lebanese General Security, Ministry of Higher Education, National Institute of Statistics, National Water Company, Office of The Prime Minister, Al Fardan, Mango, Tatex, Najran University, University of Barcelona, University of Hikmeh
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Insurance Company11%
Real Estate/Law Firm11%
Government9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise31%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Everteam is ranked 30th in Enterprise Content Management while Saperion is ranked 21st in Enterprise Content Management. Everteam is rated 0.0, while Saperion is rated 3.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Saperion writes "I would like to see improvements in the web client and the workflow engine". Everteam is most compared with , whereas Saperion is most compared with Hyland OnBase.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.