Everest Blueriq vs Intellect BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and Intellect BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.
Top Answer:The platform's initial setup process could be better.
Top Answer:We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
260
Comparisons
209
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
282
Rating
8.0
Views
146
Comparisons
117
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Blueriq, Aquima
Learn More
Everest
Video Not Available
Overview
Blueriq is the software platform for organizations with knowledge-based, rule-driven business processes. By modeling these processes in one central area, automate and integrate, you can respond quickly to changes, creating the ultimate customer experience and streamline your services.

Intellect is a leading provider of Cloud BPM software built for a mobile world, with an award winning rules-based workflow capability. Intellect is focused on delivering the fastest ROI in the industry, and delivers exceptional results for mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises seeking fast time-to-value. The Intellect 8 BPM Platform empowers users to create and manage enterprise apps that include advanced workflow, smart forms, custom reports, and integration capabilities. Click here to learn more: http://hubs.ly/H01Q1R90

Sample Customers
Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg
300+ customers including American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, American Specialty Health, Baker Corp, Bayview Loan Servicing, Circle K, CoreMedica Laboratories, Dunn-Edwards Paints, DynaCare, Edwards Technologies, Emerson Climate Technologies, Enviva, Georgetown University, HGL, Host Hotels & Resorts, Hubbell, Humboldt County, Jacobs, Northgate Markets, Parkways Schools, Princess Cruises, Silliker, Stryker, ThermoFisher Scientific, Wind River, a division of Intel.
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise20%
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Everest Blueriq is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while Intellect BPM is ranked 56th in Business Process Management (BPM). Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while Intellect BPM is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intellect BPM writes "It allows for business process data to be captured in a way that's usable and structured for not just business process automation, but business process improvement and optimization". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas Intellect BPM is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.