We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
