Everest Blueriq vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Everest Logo
256 views|208 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
views| comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
ChrisBiemans
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

More Everest Blueriq Pros →

"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

More Everest Blueriq Cons →

"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.
Top Answer:The platform's initial setup process could be better.
Top Answer:We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
256
Comparisons
208
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
282
Rating
8.0
Unranked
In Business Process Management (BPM)
Comparisons
Also Known As
Blueriq, Aquima
NetWeaver BPM
Learn More
Everest
Video Not Available
Overview
Blueriq is the software platform for organizations with knowledge-based, rule-driven business processes. By modeling these processes in one central area, automate and integrate, you can respond quickly to changes, creating the ultimate customer experience and streamline your services.
SAP Netweaver BPM allows companies to design their process, deploy it, Identify the bottlenecks and finally optimize the process by removing these bottlenecks and hence increasing transparency, efficiency and maintainability.
Sample Customers
Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg
Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.