We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"I would like to see the price improve."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.