Evolven vs IBM Streams comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Evolven Logo
143 views|67 comparisons
IBM Logo
678 views|598 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Evolven and IBM Streams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution’s licenses pricing is different from one region to another region. I rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten.
Top Answer:the limited number of connectors. This shall be overcome with work-arounds or eventually buying additional connectors to complete the solution.
Top Answer:We use the solution for data pipeline by modernizing the traditional ETL jobs done through advanced streaming. Another use case is building the g2g streaming platform, which facilitates data exchange… more »
Ranking
16th
Views
143
Comparisons
67
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
678
Comparisons
598
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
447
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM InfoSphere Streams
Learn More
Overview
Change and configuration management software with configuration changes tracking, audit trail reports, changes filtering and grouping.
IBM Streams is an advanced analytic platform that allows user-developed applications to quickly ingest, analyze and correlate information as it arrives from thousands of data stream sources. The solution can handle very high data throughput rates, up to millions of events or messages per second. Streams helps you analyze data in motion, simplify development of streaming applications, and extend the value of existing systems.
Sample Customers
Aegon, Barclays, Chubb, Deloitte, DLL, HP, Huber, imshealth, ING, JPMorgan Chase, Moody's, Quintiles, Southboro Medical Group, Tullet Prebon, VSE Corporation, Western Union
Globo TV, All England Lawn Tennis Club, CenterPoint Energy, Consolidated Communications Holdings, Darwin Ecosystem, Emory University Hospital, ICICI Securities, Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Living Roads, Mobileum, Optibus, Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform (SOSCIP), University of Alberta, University of Montana, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Wimbledon 2015
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company15%
Comms Service Provider6%
Government5%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Evolven is ranked 16th in IT Operations Analytics while IBM Streams is ranked 15th in Streaming Analytics with 5 reviews. Evolven is rated 7.0, while IBM Streams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Evolven writes "Provides visualization of risk levels. However, alerting needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Streams writes "A solution for data pipelines but has connector limitations". Evolven is most compared with , whereas IBM Streams is most compared with Confluent, Azure Stream Analytics, Apache Spark, Apache Flink and Google Cloud Dataflow.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.