Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs Securonix UEBA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Securonix UEBA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Cynet and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA.
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
Answer: It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information ingested) but with a firm on 10k+ I wouldn't be so sure that this means a better price. The total cost of ownership would be more linear though. On the other hand QRadar is by far a better SIEM solution and if your use-cases lean towards that, then I would suggest looking towards Qradar. Qradar does have a steeper learning curve but that's purely because of the richer feature set, it just takes more time to take it all in.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's initial setup process is easy.""It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology.""I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it. The solution has the ability to build a session, basically. It pulls a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe. It's quite helpful.""The most valuable feature of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is the easy-to-use user interface.""The advanced analytics has a really great overview of user behavior.""The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it.""Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions.""The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pros →

"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis.""One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients.""Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."

More Securonix UEBA Pros →

Cons
"Updating the new release of Exabeam Fusion SIEM takes time and slows our performance.""They need to focus on more of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and coverage. They claim they cover about 70 to 80%. I'm not sure if it's really quite that much, however.""I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product.""They should provide detailed information about detecting phishing emails.""The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward.""We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment.""Adding to the number of certifications that they have, for example, ISO 27001, would be helpful.""The only problem is that the UI is not very impressive."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Cons →

"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve.""When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced.""The area that needs improvement is reporting."

More Securonix UEBA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
  • "There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
  • "Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."
  • "When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."
  • More Securonix UEBA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Dante Cardenas
    Chetankumar Savalagimath - PeerSpot reviewerChetankumar Savalagimath
    Real User

    All three security solutions are defined and different smartness they hold it all depends on how is your requirement.

    Securonix UEBA is a Hadoop bases UEBA technology tool the tools understand the infrastructure and users and then work accordingly. (Wide Customer industry support) (Average cost)

    IBM QRadar is a SIEM with all in the composite tool can bring in UEBA and other security solution. (Wide Customer industry support) (Average cost)

    Exabeam is a mathematical bases security solutioning tool, it learns infra and then provides a solution, it's a bit noisy in some instances. (Medium Customer industry support) (Costly)

    If you tell us what exactly you require or how id your infra set up, then it would good to suggest a tool.

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's initial setup process is easy.
    Top Answer:Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features.
    Top Answer:When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced. There are numerous other integrations with various packages that are… more »
    Top Answer:Securonix UEBA is used for lateral movement detection, ransomware detection, multiple malware detections, user activity monitoring, and behavior analysis. We have completed a large number of… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,731
    Comparisons
    1,321
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    477
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    834
    Comparisons
    558
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics
    Learn More
    Securonix Solutions
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Exabeam Fusion SIEM is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

    -Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
    -Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
    -Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
    -Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
    -Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
    -Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

    Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) leverages sophisticated machine learning and behavior analytics to analyze and correlate interactions between users, systems, applications, IP addresses, and data. Light, nimble, and quick to deploy, Securonix UEBA detects advanced insider threats, cyber threats, fraud, cloud data compromise, and non-compliance. Built-in automated response playbooks and customizable case management work flows allow your security team to respond to threats quickly, accurately, and efficiently

    Sample Customers
    Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
    Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise23%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Cynet and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Exabeam Fusion SIEM is ranked 4th in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 10 reviews while Securonix UEBA is ranked 14th in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews. Exabeam Fusion SIEM is rated 8.0, while Securonix UEBA is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Exabeam Fusion SIEM writes "Enables centralized log collection on a single platform". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Securonix UEBA writes "Inbuilt detection algorithms, attentive technical support, and reasonably priced". Exabeam Fusion SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel and Splunk User Behavior Analytics, whereas Securonix UEBA is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight Analytics and Securonix Next-Gen SIEM.

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.