Exinda vs Ipanema IpIengine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GFI Logo
502 views|130 comparisons
Ipanema Technologies Logo
76 views|33 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Exinda and Ipanema IpIengine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is priced well for the market, for what it needs to do."
  • "The pricing and licensing are pretty fair and really competitive. There are other SD-WAN solutions that are pretty costly because they build in a service where they'll manage it for you, which is really great. I don't know if Exinda has that option as well. However, we are a small shop and cost-conscious. For things like this, we are accustomed to self-managing and this solution suits us just fine. For a tool that gives you, like the graphs and reporting, it has a fair price point."
  • More Exinda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 15 in WAN Optimization
    Views
    502
    Comparisons
    130
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    11th
    out of 15 in WAN Optimization
    Views
    76
    Comparisons
    33
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IpIengine
    Learn More
    Ipanema Technologies
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Exinda is designed to help Network Managers solve pressing IT problems in today's complex network. Our award winning technology combines interactive analytics, an intelligent recommendation engine and powerful actions like shaping and optimization, all in one solution.

    The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

    Sample Customers
    UMass Dartmouth, MLB Network, R&R Ice Cream, Savills, Manhattan School of Music, Blum Shapiro, Cincinnati Public Schools, City of Richmond, Genting Casinos, The Salvation Army, VoIP Unlimited, Frontier Silicon, Lakeshore Toltest, CTI Foods
    Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    University29%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Marketing Services Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Educational Organization12%
    Real Estate/Law Firm11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise44%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Exinda is ranked 7th in WAN Optimization while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization. Exinda is rated 8.8, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Exinda writes "Gives us the ability to prioritize network traffic into a hierarchy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". Exinda is most compared with Symantec Proxy and Citrix SD-WAN, whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with .

    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.