We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."
"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."
"The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error."
"The scalability of the product is good."
"It is easy for a non-technical person to use and adopt."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is the ease of use of the solution."
"The automation is very fast and you don't need to be overly proficient in coding."
"The best thing about the solution is that there is a record and playback functionality."
"I like the feature where you can define a model that represents your website and then reuse the components from the model. It makes creating more test cases easy."
"I rate Katalon Studio's scalability a four out of five."
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."
"Katalon doesn't support testing of hybrid applications. It's a limitation."
"Katalon Studio could improve having visual testing, but I think they're launching that feature very soon. We would like to see an increase in the usage of AI."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works."
"One aspect that can be improved is testing for desktop applications. I would like to see them support more technologies in this area."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"I can say that in my company, we struggle a lot with iOS automation."
"Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP."
More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 27th in Test Automation Tools while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 40 reviews. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, LambdaTest, Sauce Labs and AWS Device Farm, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Appium and Testim.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.