Compare Experitest vs. Micro Focus UFT Mobile

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Experitest Logo
1,577 views|1,226 comparisons
Micro Focus UFT Mobile Logo
1,816 views|1,110 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

More Experitest Pros »

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing.""The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare.""The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

More Micro Focus UFT Mobile Pros »

Cons
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

More Experitest Cons »

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement.""We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it.""I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

More Micro Focus UFT Mobile Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

More Experitest Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run.
Top Answer: It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number… more »
Top Answer: I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
8th
Views
1,577
Comparisons
1,226
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
624
Rating
7.0
6th
Views
1,816
Comparisons
1,110
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
446
Rating
6.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Experitest Seetest
Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center
Learn More
Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Micro Focus UFT Mobile amplifies team productivity by providing a centralized, enterprise-level, end-to-end lab and management gateway of distributed real mobile devices and emulators that helps teams develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize their omnichannel mobile applications to promote an enhanced user experience across all digital touchpoints. Testers and Developers alike can validate all aspects of the mobile user experience including functionality, performance, and security using services simulations and network virtualization. UFT Mobile supports continuous testing and drives continuous improvement and optimization by analyzing availability and performance of mobile application via production monitoring.

Offer
Learn more about Experitest
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Mobile
Sample Customers
Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee
Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider13%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Experitest is ranked 8th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus UFT Mobile is ranked 6th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Experitest is rated 7.0, while Micro Focus UFT Mobile is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Experitest writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Mobile writes "Enables users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators". Experitest is most compared with Perfecto, AWS Device Farm, Xamarin Test Cloud, Sauce Labs and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Micro Focus UFT Mobile is most compared with Appium, Micro Focus UFT One, AWS Device Farm, Perfecto and Micro Focus UFT Developer.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.