Compare Experitest vs. Micro Focus UFT One

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Experitest Logo
1,483 views|1,114 comparisons
Micro Focus UFT One Logo
19,102 views|12,329 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: August 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

More Experitest Pros »

"UFT has improved our ability to regression test.""This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain.""The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high.""The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols.""The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement.""The initial setup is relatively easy.""On a scale of one to ten, I would give Micro Focus UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis.""It helps in identifying defects earlier. With manual testing, that 15-day timeline meant there were times when we would find defects on the 11th or 12th day of the cycle, but with automation we are able to run the complete suite within a day and we are able to find the failures. It helps us to provide early feedback."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pros »

Cons
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

More Experitest Cons »

"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.""One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement.""The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients.""Technical support could be improved.""We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes.""The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded.""They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user.""We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."

More Micro Focus UFT One Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

More Experitest Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue.""The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it."""Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive.""The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run.
Top Answer: It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number… more »
Top Answer: I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long… more »
Top Answer: Any updates on this @Don Ingerson. I am trying to pre-assess the same question. Whether I would get any performance improvements in executing scripts (VBScripts) in UFT 14.XX or UFT 15.XX compared to… more »
Top Answer: Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need… more »
Top Answer: There is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to friction-free continuous testing across the software life cycle, as a local installation is required to run UFT. Most of the time… more »
Ranking
8th
Views
1,483
Comparisons
1,114
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
624
Rating
7.0
2nd
Views
19,102
Comparisons
12,329
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
1,355
Rating
7.9
Comparisons
Also Known As
Experitest Seetest
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn More
Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Micro Focus UFT One simplifies end-to-end functional testing using intelligent test automation and embedded AI-based capabilities to accelerate testing across web, mobile, desktop, mainframe, API, and composite and packaged enterprise-grade apps.

QA and Testing teams can efficiently scale tests across distributed infrastructures and in parallel on web and mobile; script once and replay all tests with cross-browser support; and leverage a broad ecosystem of integrations from version control to continuous integration to agile and DevOps.

With support of 200+ technologies including SAP, Salesforce, Java, Citrix and more, UFT One increases test coverage from the UI to the API—and everything in between—for true multi-platform application testing.

Micro Focus UFT One is also known as Unified Functional Testing, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP).

Offer
Learn more about Experitest
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Sample Customers
Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee
Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company16%
Healthcare Company16%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm10%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise88%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: August 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Experitest is ranked 8th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 2nd in Mobile App Testing Tools with 15 reviews. Experitest is rated 7.0, while Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Experitest writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "Testers have been able to free up their time: instead of doing mundane, repetitive tasks, they shift them off to automation". Experitest is most compared with Perfecto, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, AWS Device Farm, Sauce Labs and Xamarin Test Cloud, whereas Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT Developer, SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ and Silk Test.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.