Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Xamarin Test Cloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Xamarin Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."
  • "We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."
  • More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    10th
    Views
    481
    Comparisons
    342
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    13th
    Views
    143
    Comparisons
    108
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Testing Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Experitest Seetest, Experitest
    Learn More
    Overview

    Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

    Find bugs before you ship with automated tests running on the devices your customers use. You can test everything your users can do, from pinching and swiping to double-tapping and scrolling. Find performance problems on any OS automatically with step-by step memory and performance tracking. Beautiful reports make it easy to know when you’re ready for launch.

    Sample Customers
    Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee
    FanDuel, AMC Amazing, Slack
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Retailer7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Testing Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 10th in Mobile App Testing Tools while Xamarin Test Cloud is ranked 13th in Mobile App Testing Tools. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while Xamarin Test Cloud is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, LambdaTest, Sauce Labs and Katalon Studio, whereas Xamarin Test Cloud is most compared with AWS Device Farm and Perfecto.

    See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.