We compared Vectra AI and ExtraHop Reveal(x) based on our user's reviews in 4 parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Vectra AI excels in customer service, advanced threat detection, and competitive pricing. User feedback on ExtraHop Reveal(x) highlights robust network visibility, intuitive user interface, and highly regarded customer support. Vectra AI users appreciate the affordability and flexibility of the pricing, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) users value the comprehensive analytics capabilities.
Features: Vectra AI stands out for its advanced threat detection capabilities, machine learning algorithms, and automated response features. ExtraHop Reveal(x) is praised for its robust network visibility, comprehensive analytics, and intuitive user interface.
Pricing and ROI: Vectra AI offers competitive pricing with reasonable setup costs and flexible licensing options. ExtraHop Reveal(x) is also well-received for its cost-effectiveness, low setup cost, and straightforward licensing process. Users have had positive experiences with both products in terms of pricing, setup cost, and licensing. Vectra AI delivered ROI that exceeded expectations with significant security and efficiency improvements. ExtraHop Reveal(x) was praised for enhancing network visibility and security with user-friendly interface and robust functionalities.
Room for Improvement: Vectra AI has room for improvement in its complex and unintuitive user interface, lack of customization options, occasional glitches, and high pricing. ExtraHop Reveal(x) could enhance its user interface, accuracy, documentation, and customer support for a better user experience.
Deployment and Customer Support: Vectra AI may be a bit complex and require additional customization for on-prem installations. ExtraHop Reveal(x) is considered simple and offers a user-friendly initial setup. Vectra AI stands out for its exceptional customer support, with knowledgeable staff providing quick solutions. ExtraHop Reveal(x) also has good support, however, it suffers from occasional quality issues.
The summary above is based on 31 interviews we conducted recently with Vectra AI and ExtraHop Reveal(x) users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"ExtraHop Reveal(x) is one of the tools that works out of the box when it comes to threat hunting."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The most valuable features of ExtraHop Reveal(x) are the detection and alerting of network behavior and anomalies."
"We had useful information within the hour of deployment. The ability to trace back for historical analysis, as well as the behavioral analysis done with the security information, puts the user in a position to make an informed decision to mitigate the performance or security incidents. Regarding the security incidents, Reveal (x) is able to create incident cards that guide your teams through the incidents and gives you the option to delve into the transaction detail to potentially view payloads as well."
"The solution's ability to decrypt SSL traffic is its most valuable feature."
"Setting up the solution is relatively easy."
"Reveal X integrates seamlessly with CrowdStrike. If you see something sketchy on the network, you can quarantine devices through ExtraHop and it'll push to the CrowdStrike server."
"When there are performance issues with an HTTP app, ExtraHop enables us to identify the causes within a few minutes. We can see what transactions are being impacted by something that may be happening within the server environment."
"Vectra produces actionable data using automation. That has helped us. It's less manpower now to look at incidents, which has definitely increased efficiency. Right now, in a lot of cases, our mean time to detection is within zero days. This tells me by the time something happened, and we were able to detect it, it was within the same day."
"It's easy to manage, and I love the UX. It's very well designed. When we are looking for something, it's quite easy to find it."
"Vectra AI is the best. It is a major product in our cybersecurity."
"The solution's ability to reduce alerts, by rolling up numerous alerts to create a single incident or campaign, helps in that it collapses all the events to a particular host, or a particular detection to a set of hosts. So it doesn't generate too many alerts. By and large, whatever alerts it generates are actionable, and actionable within the day."
"The fact that we get the visualization of what's happening on our network, which is a way of improving our security in-depth is most valuable."
"The biggest feature for us, because we are heavy Microsoft users, is its integration with Office 365. On top of Vectra AI, we use all of the Microsoft security platforms, such as Defender ATP and Sentinel. Having full integration and a central platform to look at all of the threats that are coming through from the different platforms is a huge benefit for us."
"What I like best about Vectra AI is that it alerts you about suspicious activities."
"The most useful feature is the anomaly detection because it's not signature-based. It picks up the initial part of any attack, like the recon and those aspects of the kill chain, very well."
"The solution's reporting part and GUI are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"I would like to see more cloud capability."
"Agent management could certainly use some focus. It should also be a little bit easier to work with collections. We should be able to nest collections within collections. There should be better nesting."
"The solution is expensive and gets more expensive if a company needs to scale it."
"It needs integration with more security vendors."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"They used to have the ability to decode Citrix sign-on, setup, and tear down. Unfortunately, Citrix has stopped sharing that knowledge. Citrix has continued to change its model of processing, making it harder and harder to troubleshoot."
"I think the tuning capabilities could be improved. We're working on minimizing false positives. Apart from that, everything seems fine to me."
"One of the things I am not so happy about when it comes to Vectra is the scoring board."
"There could be an option where Vectra manages the solution remotely, and when there is an attack, there could be a notification center to give us information about the attack."
"ExtraHop has better features that seem more advantageous when compared to Vectra."
"Integration with other security components needs improvement. It should have true integration as opposed to just being a separate pane of glass."
"One of the things that we are missing a bit is the capability to add our own rules to it. At the moment, the tech engine does its thing, but we have some cool ideas to make additional rules. There should be an option in the platform to add custom rules, or there should be some kind of user group where we can suggest them for the roadmap and see if they get evaluated and get transparent communication on whether they will be implemented in the product or not."
"One thing which I have found where there could be improvement is with regard to the architecture, a little bit: how the brains and sensors function. It needs more flexibility with regard to the brain. If there were some flexibility in that regard, that would be helpful, because changing the mode of the brain is complex. In some cases, the change is permanent. You cannot revert it."
"We are using SMB 3.0, which is an encrypted protocol. When we get some alerts or something, we cannot go deep into the protocol to see what's wrong because it's encrypted. We need to decrypt the protocol in another way, which is quite difficult. We might go back to SMB 2.0 just for this reason, but that's not a good solution."
"For S&D account scans, it would be easier if Vectra AI could triage with users. If a client uses a lot of accounts, then it could indicate that these accounts are benign, for example. That would help a lot."
ExtraHop Reveal(x) is ranked 5th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 10 reviews while Vectra AI is ranked 2nd in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 22 reviews. ExtraHop Reveal(x) is rated 8.6, while Vectra AI is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) writes "Does full decryption at 100 Gbps, reduces our MTTR, and has great analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vectra AI writes "We have become more proactive, and significant noise reduction means one analyst can handle things ". ExtraHop Reveal(x) is most compared with Darktrace, Corelight, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Arista NDR and Trend Micro Deep Discovery, whereas Vectra AI is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Arista NDR, Trend Micro Deep Discovery and Corelight. See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs. Vectra AI report.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors and best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.