Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive""The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise.""The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly.""We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument.""The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code).""I like it that one can match IPs with the application name.""Synthetic transactions, WMI and SNMP query capability.""Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Pros →

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space.""Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis.""The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts.""Wire data analytics.""There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has.""The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Pros →

Cons
"Support for PHP, DB and other applications need to be supported.""We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods.""We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post.""They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker.""It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features.""The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well.""Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update.""The admin dashboard could be easier as it takes a little bit of time to get used to it."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Cons →

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services.""Network visibility is something that needs to be improved.""They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement.""They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that.""I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data.""This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
  • "The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."
  • More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
  • "The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
  • "The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
  • More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space.
    Top Answer:The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I't not cheap or expensive.
    Top Answer:What they can improve would be building a broader reach in terms of capabilities. At the same time, there are other tools on the market that could augment their offering. They either have to go broad… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    7th
    Views
    386
    Comparisons
    190
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    725
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
    Learn More
    Overview

    Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

    The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

    Sample Customers
    National Instruments, Allianz
    Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Government14%
    Media Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization49%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise54%
    Large Enterprise35%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aternity AppInternals [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is ranked 7th in IT Operations Analytics with 8 reviews. Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is rated 8.2, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aternity AppInternals [EOL] writes "We use it to see the experience of users hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations writes "Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations". Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is most compared with IDERA Precise, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is most compared with vRealize Network Insight, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, ThousandEyes, SolarWinds NPM and Dynatrace.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.