We compared ExtremeWireless and Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: ExtremeWireless stands out for its straightforward and efficient installation process, whereas the ease and complexity of Juniper Switches can vary. ExtremeWireless is highly regarded for its dependability, scalability, and seamless integration with network fabric. On the other hand, Juniper switches are valued for their combination of hardware and software, MPLS capabilities, and user-friendly interface. However, ExtremeWireless requires regular maintenance and comes with a higher cost, while Juniper switches receive mixed feedback regarding pricing, stability, and documentation. Juniper's customer service and support receive high praise, while opinions on the quality of support for ExtremeWireless are divided.
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The simplicity is great."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The wireless security solution is the most valuable feature of ExtremeWireless."
"The product's price is competitive. It is an impressive and reliable product."
"ExtremeWireless is a powerful solution with good integration. It works perfectly for us."
"The solution is easy to use and manage. Overall it is very simple to understand and users do not know it is a cloud solution."
"In terms of the most valuable features, I like the integration with the fabric. The network fabric completely integrates with wireless as well."
"The initial setup process is simple."
"The most useful feature is how the product integrates with the Microsoft directory in the cloud."
"It's cloud-based and very easy to deploy."
"I like that it's fairly easy to implement these ethernet switches."
"The scalability is excellent. It's one of the aspects of the solution that is quite good."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"The most valuable feature is that the CLI is the same on all of the Juniper devices, including routers, switches, and firewalls."
"I like the simplicity of it."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Junos operating system."
"The virtual Chassis feature for stacking is good in general, with high bandwidth for the link, which is good."
"It is stable."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The price could be better."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The solution is expensive."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"The reports could prove in ExtremeWireless. However, we are in the early stages of use and we might be able to configure them better."
"The ability to integrate with network devices from other vendors would be helpful."
"ExtremeWireless support isn't very good."
"The onsite controllers are not as good as the cloud controller. I would also like ExtremeWireless to add web filtering on the access point. This feature is available from other vendors but not ExtremeWireless."
"ExtremeWireless should fix some general bugs and make the user interface more user-friendly."
"Technical support is an area that needs to be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to see more security features."
"They could provide different product models. Additionally, there could be a feature to manage devices."
"Some areas of technical support could be better."
"In an upcoming release, Juniper Ethernet Switches could improve by having more microservices."
"The price could be a bit lower."
"The initial setup of switches is not that simple."
"I would like the ability to operate with other operating systems."
"The operating system, Junos OS, often has bugs which forces rollbacks or additional upgrades to resolve."
"The solution is a bit costly compared to other products."
"We are undergoing a migration to software-defined networking. Different vendors have to integrate with each other and we are not seeing this type of capability within Juniper. We are getting left behind in this technology trend by staying with this solution. Juniper is also losing a bit of market share because of this."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →
ExtremeWireless is ranked 14th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is ranked 8th in Ethernet Switches with 63 reviews. ExtremeWireless is rated 8.0, while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ExtremeWireless writes "An easy to deploy solution that can scale and expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches writes "Provides campus switches and access switches that are simple to deploy, but the code isn't stable enough for a leaf and spine design". ExtremeWireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, ExtremeCloud IQ and Cisco Wireless, whereas Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, Aruba Switches, Arista Networks Platform, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches and Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
