Compare F5 Advanced WAF vs. Imperva Incapsula

F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews while Imperva Incapsula is ranked 9th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 7 reviews. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 9.2, while Imperva Incapsula is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Provides load-balancing and security for our enterprise-level clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva Incapsula writes "Stops web attacks from denying services and endangering the security of sensitive data ". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Imperva Incapsula is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall and AWS WAF. See our F5 Advanced WAF vs. Imperva Incapsula report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Imperva Incapsula and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This solution is an enterprise-class firewall that provides both load-balancing and security.The anti-bot protection is the solution's most valuable feature. Safe-guard or credential staffing are also useful features.This solution inspects your traffic and based on that, automatically create distinct qualities for you, so you can add this to the policy already created. That's what I like most.The solution isn't too expensive. The license allows you to license what you need and leave out what you don't need.I definitely recommend this solution because of the time you save on analysis.The best solution for WAF.With F5 Advanced WAF, it was protection for online publications and for our customers that caused us to choose the platform.The most valuable feature is artificial intelligence and to get extra internal access.

Read more »

It is an effective threat mitigation tool.The technical support is excellent.The solution has a very good interface.I like the user-friendly interface.They're quite easy to install and quite easy to set up. Clients really like that. Especially when you're dealing with the cloud, it's really easy.This product is a reliable defense from malicious attacks on a network environment.Scalability is pretty easy on the base platform. You just add another, and you're ready to go.Provides Anti-DDoS protection, as well as other protections like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting, and antiscanner. These types of protection are valuable to the business due to the daily attacks on our portals, and that often cannot be seen without a tool like this.

Read more »

Cons
This solution can be made more user-friendly.The solution's dashboard could be improved. When you're moving from policy to policy, the logs and the integration of the logs in other systems aren't straightforward.I would not expect traffic details to pass through the web application firewall across the length of the whole application. I think that there is a web application where it can let the application function without traffic going in into the WAF.The solution is tedious. It takes a lot of discrete settings so one needs to get detailed and granular when they use the solution. It takes you a whole lot of energy and concentration to configure. It needs to be much more straight-forward, like other web solutions.One thing that can be improved, is to increase the quantity over predefine policy.I think the deployment templates can be better.F5 Advanced WAF needs better integration within the application, like remote dashboards.The administrator's user interface and some of the settings can sometimes be very complicated to understand.

Read more »

Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa.The rules surrounding the making of web applications could be improved.We would like them to hire people in Sweden because it's quite hard when people are sitting in the UK or Belgium because some of the customers really want them to be local.Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments.The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet.Imperva now offers add-ons to add functionality, but I would like to see these included in the product, even if it would cost more.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Licensing fees for this solution are paid on a yearly basis.After buying the program, you just pay for the support every year.I think the price is very high.The pricing is too high.

Read more »

The data packages are higher than our needs so we end up paying for data that we don't use.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
972
Comparisons
596
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
441
Avg. Rating
9.1
Views
14,584
Comparisons
10,292
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
537
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Incapsula
Learn
F5
Imperva
Overview

At F5, we give our customers the freedom to securely deliver every app, anywhere—with confidence. All F5 products are highly programmable and integrate into any environment, whether on premises or in any cloud. To date, 48 of the Fortune 50 companies rely on F5 to deliver apps that customers and employees can securely access at any time, on any device, from any location.

Imperva Incapsula is a cloud-based application delivery service that protects websites and safeguards web applications and their data from attacks, and improves their performance by enhancing user experience. Incapsula includes a security platform with a web application firewall, DDoS mitigation, content delivery network, and global load balancer to maximize performance.

Offer
Learn more about F5 Advanced WAF
Learn more about Imperva Incapsula
Sample Customers
MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City BankHitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Comms Service Provider14%
K 12 Educational Company Or School11%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Non Tech Company16%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Imperva Incapsula and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.