Compare F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware AppWall
F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 2 reviews. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 9.2, while Radware AppWall is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Provides load-balancing and security for our enterprise-level clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Easy to use, easy to configure, and the hardware is robust". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Imperva Incapsula and Fortinet FortiWeb.
Most Helpful Review | |
Use Radware AppWall? Share your opinion. | |
 Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020. 406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
This solution is an enterprise-class firewall that provides both load-balancing and security. The anti-bot protection is the solution's most valuable feature. Safe-guard or credential staffing are also useful features. This solution inspects your traffic and based on that, automatically create distinct qualities for you, so you can add this to the policy already created. That's what I like most. The solution isn't too expensive. The license allows you to license what you need and leave out what you don't need. I definitely recommend this solution because of the time you save on analysis. The best solution for WAF. With F5 Advanced WAF, it was protection for online publications and for our customers that caused us to choose the platform. The most valuable feature is artificial intelligence and to get extra internal access. | Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure. The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable. |
Cons | |
This solution can be made more user-friendly. The solution's dashboard could be improved. When you're moving from policy to policy, the logs and the integration of the logs in other systems aren't straightforward. I would not expect traffic details to pass through the web application firewall across the length of the whole application. I think that there is a web application where it can let the application function without traffic going in into the WAF. The solution is tedious. It takes a lot of discrete settings so one needs to get detailed and granular when they use the solution. It takes you a whole lot of energy and concentration to configure. It needs to be much more straight-forward, like other web solutions. One thing that can be improved, is to increase the quantity over predefine policy. I think the deployment templates can be better. F5 Advanced WAF needs better integration within the application, like remote dashboards. The administrator's user interface and some of the settings can sometimes be very complicated to understand. | Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers. The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Licensing fees for this solution are paid on a yearly basis. After buying the program, you just pay for the support every year. I think the price is very high. The pricing is too high. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs. 406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 972 Comparisons 596 Reviews 9 Average Words per Review 441 Avg. Rating 9.1 | Views 994 Comparisons 836 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 264 Avg. Rating 8.5 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 77% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. |  Compared 24% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. Compared 13% of the time. |
Learn | |
| F5 | Radware |
Overview | |
At F5, we give our customers the freedom to securely deliver every app, anywhere—with confidence. All F5 products are highly programmable and integrate into any environment, whether on premises or in any cloud. To date, 48 of the Fortune 50 companies rely on F5 to deliver apps that customers and employees can securely access at any time, on any device, from any location. | AppWall - Radware's Web Application Firewall (WAF), ensures fast, reliable and secure delivery of mission-critical Web applications for corporate networks and in the cloud. AppWall is an ICSA Labs certified and PCI compliant WAF that combines positive and negative security models to provide complete protection against web application attacks, web application attacks behind CDNs, API manipulations, advanced HTTP attacks (slowloris, dynamic floods), brute force attacks on login pages and more. |
Offer | |
Learn more about F5 Advanced WAF | Learn more about Radware AppWall |
Sample Customers | |
| MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank | Accuview.com, Ace, ADP, BuyPass, Computershare, DTCC, Firehost, Garanti, HP, Konami, Mohawk, SeatPG, Telenet |
Top Industries | |
Software R&D Company26% Comms Service Provider14% K 12 Educational Company Or School10% Energy/Utilities Company9% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
406,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also F5 Advanced WAF Reviews, Radware AppWall Reviews, and our list of Best Web Application Firewall (WAF) Companies.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.