We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. ForgeRock

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. ForgeRock and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution's ability to save and manage of all my passwords is great."

More OneLogin Workforce Identity Pros »

"Our customers have never complained about the stability""This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use.""The solution is stable and reliable."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Pros »

"The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent.""The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable.""We create and define the permissions and configurations for the users.""ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready.""Even though we have very small business interests with them today, they see that we plan on growing drastically over the next two years. Therefore, we have excellent support and we are now at a point where we are not calling tech support. We pick up a phone and call the Account Manager and they'll get everything resolved for us. We don't have to queue along with everybody else and go through a long process.""I like the intelligent authentication feature.""Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users.""The solution integrates well and it is important for them to keep up with the current trends in the market quickly enough, and they have been doing a good job at it."

More ForgeRock Pros »

Cons
"In terms of managing the users on a large scale, it would be easier if they had some kind of user management portal."

More OneLogin Workforce Identity Cons »

"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better""The price of this product can be improved.""The solution is quite costly."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Cons »

"The identity management model needs a bit of improvement.""They should improve the solution by include reporting.""I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive.""Automatic Deployment needs improvement. it could be made easier.""We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced.""It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers.""It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement.""The solution requires more simplified customization. However, part of the problem is my clients determining their own preferences. Technology can help and do many things, but you have to define your own policies to ensure that the solution or service works within those parameters. Helping customers understand their business and different processes is another issue not relating to the functionality of this solution."

More ForgeRock Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's a bit pricey and could be more competitive.""We have multiple clients we are looking at right now. We are at a very small number, however, the idea and the goal is to grow. We are looking at about $100,000 and $50,000 a minimum a month cost. That'd be minimum maybe in a couple of years.""Its price is comparable to other products in the market.""Its licensing is on a yearly basis, but it also depends on the contract that you have with the vendor. They have multiple types of contracts. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees. If you need some of the features, you have to pay more.""The license is purchased annually per user. However, you can negotiate if you are signing for a longer period of time. When comparing this solution to others on the market it is priced fair, it is not at the top of the price range or at the bottom end.""The pricing of the solution is fair but I do not have the full details."

More ForgeRock Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution is stable and reliable.
Top Answer: The solution is expensive. It's not a cheap product. You do need to pay extra for certain features and services.
Top Answer: The solution is pretty technical. The initial setup is complex. The solution is quite costly. The solution could offer… more »
Top Answer: The solution is very scalable. We have a lot of users that have been increasing over the years that we have been using… more »
Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is fair but I do not have the full details.
Top Answer: In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by limiting the need to do customizations.
Comparisons
Also Known As
OneLogin, OneLogin
F5 Access Policy Manager
ForgeRock Identity Platform, ForgeRock OpenIDM
Learn More
Overview

OneLogin Simplifies Identity and Access Management for a More Efficient, Secure Enterprise. Empower employees, customers and partners with secure access to your cloud and company apps on any device. Transform your enterprise security and centralize control of users, apps and devices.

F5® BIG-IP® Access Policy Manager® (APM) is an access management proxy solution for managing global access to the enterprise networks, cloud providers, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Through a single management interface, BIG-IP APM consolidates remote, mobile, network, virtual, and web access. BIG-IP APM can also serve as a bridge between modern and classic authentication and authorization protocols and methods. For applications which are unable to support modern authentication and authorization protocols, like SAML and OAuth with OIDC, but which do support classic authentication methods, BIG-IP APM converts user credentials to the appropriate authentication standard supported by the application.

Key features of BIG-IP APM are (but not limited to):

• Support for Identity Aware Proxy (IAP) enabling Zero Trust application access
• Context-based authorization with dynamic L4/L7 ACLs
• Integration with third-party MFA solutions
• DTLS 2.0 mode for delivering and securing applications
• SAML 2.0 identity federation support
• Support for OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol
• SSO support for classic authentication (Kerberos, header- based, etc.), credential caching, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, and FIDO2 (U2F)
• AAA server authentication and high-availability
• Integration with leading IAM vendor products (Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity)
• BIG IP Edge Client and F5 Access integrate with VMware Horizon ONE (AirWatch), Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360
• Risk-based access leveraging third-party UEBA and risk engines (HTTP Connector)

Open source provisioning solution for real-time user management life cycle automation.
Offer
Learn more about OneLogin Workforce Identity
Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Learn more about ForgeRock
Sample Customers
AAA, Pandora, Yelp, Zendesk, Stanford, Hult, Pacific Life, One Medical Group, RichRelevance, CloudBees, Cleveland Institute of Art, reed.co.uk, Awana, Analyte, Vision Critical, Yammer
City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office
Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. ForgeRock and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is ranked 11th in Access Management with 3 reviews while ForgeRock is ranked 3rd in Access Management with 9 reviews. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is rated 8.6, while ForgeRock is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) writes "A robust platform that enables our clients to do almost anything". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Good for multi-client setups and easy to implement but the scalability seems uncertain". F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager, Azure Active Directory, Amazon Cognito and Auth0, whereas ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Azure Active Directory, Okta Workforce Identity and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. See our F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. ForgeRock report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.