Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
F5 BIG-IP is used with good applications and functions as an application firewall with additional features. We will not use any feature or any service unless there is a business case and there is a need for implementation.
We're able to do load balancing and global load balancing. When you marry those two products together, you can do a lot more. We're able to deliver our applications more securely and faster. It has improved our deliverability where we have more service across the shared data centers. We can intelligently reach all of those client connections across all of the servers and do it fairly quickly. It has helped improve our application delivery and performance.
It is a fast and available solution.
It is the perfect solution when you have high workloads in your IT environment.
It integrates with AWS WAF, which makes it easy to deploy without changes to your infrastructure.
It improves the overall performance of applications by decreasing the burden on servers associated with managing and maintaining applications and network sessions, as well as by performing application-specific tasks.
Initial setup is easy and pretty standard.
It is a very good, flexible solution. It helps us to catch up on flaws in our partner solutions on top of its load balancing feature.
It solves a problem for me where I can build files, not based on the health of the check, but rather the speed of the check.
I can simplify configurations of many internal services (e.g. Web server configs) by moving some elements (like SSL) to HAProxy. I can also disable additional applications, like Varnish, by moving traffic shaping configurations to HAProxy.
Advanced traffic rules, including stick tables and ACLs, which allow me to shape traffic while it's load balanced.
Performance configuration options with threads, processes, and core stickiness are very valuable.
The ability to handle a sequence of front- and back-ends gives the user the opportunity to send traffic through different services.
We were able to use HAProxy for round robin with our databases, or for a centralized TCP connection in one host.
It reduced the load on our main load balancers.
We did not need technical support because the documentation is good.
The license terms for "non-commercial" will be a challenge for us.
The license terms for "non-commercial" will are challenging for us.
There are issues with F5 BIG-IP but they are minor issues not affecting production and services. Sometimes the operations and the facility systems fail. However, there is an alert action from the windows. An ordeal for the manager.
I would like to see improvement in the manageability and easier setup.
I would like them to have more flexible models.
Performance: Using the product, applications are jittery.
Needs to provide a visual interface to follow a customer's activity (from client to BIG-IP to SNAT IP to the chosen server, then back). Today, we are still performing packet captures.
We would like to see load balancing between the cloud and the on-premise, a straightforward deployment feature.
The logging functionality could use improvement, as it is a little cryptic.
There are three main areas to improve: 1) Make remote management more modern by adding API. 2) Propose a general HA solution for HAProxy (no I'm using keepalived for this). 3) Thread option should be a bit more stable.
The configuration should be more friendly, perhaps with a Web interface. For example, I work with the ClusterControl product for Severalnines, and we have a Web interface to deploy the HAProxy load-balancer.
We need to handle new connections by dropping, or queuing them while the HAProxy restarts, and because HAProxy does not handle split config files.
The web stats UI, which provides the status of the health and numbers, could greatly benefit from having a RESTful interface to control the load-balanced nodes. Although there is a hack around the UI (by issuing a POST request to HAProxy with parameters), a RESTful interface would greatly improve the automation process (through Chef and Ansible).
I would like to evaluate load-balancing algorithms other than round robin and SSL offloading. Also, it would be helpful if I could logically divide the HAProxy load-balancing into multiple entities so that I would install one HA Proxy LB application which could be used for different Web servers for different applications. I am not sure if these features are available.
They should introduce one feature that I know many people, including me, are waiting for: HAProxy should have provide hot-swipe for back-end servers. Also, they need a more detailed GUI for monitoring and configuration.
It needs proper HTTP/2 support.
Pricing and Cost Advice
They are expensive.
We purchased through the AWS Marketplace because it was a popular way to go, and we were intrigued. The price of this product is not an issue. They have good pricing and licensing.
Unless the price difference is large, this is not the primary concern for the product. The performance and product-related issues (secure for VPN, multi-function for network device, etc.) are the keys.
I would recommend that the cost be lowered.
If you are planning to use security features, better to go for strong hardware and the best bundle license, which is great for web security.
The price is high.
We have found the pricing and licensing on AWS to be competitive.
Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good. We chose to go through the AWS Marketplace because everything that we needed was a soft appliance. We needed something to work in Amazon, and this product was available there.
The only cost is for the image manager, who is responsible for uploading the image, and that is trivial.
I think that the pricing is very fair, I would definitely recommend buying the Enterprise license.
We use NGINX as well. However, because the health checks are a paid feature, I like to avoid it whenever possible.
If you don't have expertise then go with the licensed version. Otherwise, open-source is the best solution.
Very good value for the money. One of the simplest licensing schemes in this category of products.
Test/lab virtual machines can be installed without a licence. They can't be used for performance testing but otherwise behave like production nodes.
The price is well worth it. HAProxy Enterprise Edition paid for itself within months, simply due to the resiliency it brings. It was a bit more expensive than we were originally interested in paying, but we are thankful we chose to go with HAProxy.
out of 27 in Application Delivery Controllers
Average Words per Review
out of 27 in Application Delivery Controllers
Average Words per Review
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
|BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP||HAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise Edition, HAPEE|
|The BIG-IP family of products offers the application intelligence that network managers need to ensure applications are fast, secure, and available. All BIG-IP products share a common underlying architecture, F5's Traffic Management Operating System (TMOS), which provides unified intelligence, flexibility, and programmability. Together, BIG-IP's powerful platforms, advanced modules, and centralized management system make up the most comprehensive set of application delivery tools in the industry.|
HAProxy is the most widely used software load balancer and application delivery controller in the world. The core HAProxy application delivery engine is an open source project chiefly maintained by HAProxy Technologies and assisted by a thriving open source community. HAProxy Community Edition is available for free at haproxy.org. HAProxy Enterprise Edition is packaged with additional enterprise class features, services and premium support from HAProxy Technologies.
Learn more about F5 BIG-IP
Learn more about HAProxy
|Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.||Booking.com, GitHub, Reddit, StackOverflow, Tumblr, Vimeo, Yelp|
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm21%
Software R&D Company27%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm9%
Financial Services Firm33%
Marketing Services Firm22%
Software R&D Company26%
Comms Service Provider9%