We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."The solution is robust and reliable."
"I think F5's tech support may be better than Citrix's because they mainly focus on the ADC product, but Citrix support covers Hypervisor, XenMobile, FAS, and ADC. And from my experience, sometimes, we face some issues that Citrix cannot handle."
"One of the best features of the solution is the operating system."
"Stable and scalable network traffic management solution for applications. It has good performance."
"I have found F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) to be stable."
"iRules are very valuable. In addition to that, the way profiles are depicted by the LTM is also very good."
"The capability is at a seven or eight out of ten."
"The combination of ADC and WAN is the most valuable feature."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would expect more integration with different platforms and more integration with the backend systems. Additionally, in the next release, I would like a more secure version."
"Currently, the product offers everything we need. I can't recall any features that may be lacking."
"The synchronization does works fairly well. However, if I were to make changes, I would make it easier to start the sync process."
"The auto logout feature after three minutes is terrible. I wish they would make that longer, since it is not a feature that we can change."
"While the licensing is good through the AWS Marketplace, it is more expensive than what you could buy yourself."
"The product is expensive."
"Fixing bugs."
"The UI could be improved."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 116 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Helps deliver applications to users in a reliable, secure, and optimized way". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus and HAProxy, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
