Compare F5 BIG-IP vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Tenable.io Web Application Scanning? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I was able to simply and quickly set up the WAF rules and security, and also set up easily complex policies and rules which gave me some great features to redirect.""The detail that you have available when setting up iRules.""Where we are finding the AWS version helpful is when we are trying to scale up new environments. AWS Marketplace helps here a lot.""Load balancing generally brings high availability and a bigger ability to scale out. In some cases, it brings security, depending on how it is configured.""We have found the consistency of the application always being the way it is supposed to be as its most valuable feature.""It supports APIs and virtual additions for cloud and VMware.""Routing and load balancing are its most valuable features.""The product is very stable. We put a decent amount of stress on it given our load."

More F5 BIG-IP Pros »

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product.""The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pros »

Cons
"I used GitHub for autoscaling CloudFormation, and I found two bugs and I submitted them. Their implementation in GitHub could be cleaner and allow for a bit more customization.""For integration with other AWS environments, we do some tie-ins with some autoscaling groups. This has been challenging for us. We have had issues, where when autoscaling groups scale up, there are some instances which are not showing up in the proper size. Then, those IPs would get registered with F5, but never get released. Therefore, we are ending up with a whole bunch of ghosted IPs.""The management interface is unclear, complex, and not concise. I would like a better user interface.""I would like them to expand load balancing, being able to go across multiple regions to on-premise and into the cloud. This could use improvement, as it is sometimes a little cumbersome.""While the licensing is good through the AWS Marketplace, it is more expensive than what you could buy yourself.""Cloud native integration should be provided.""Native support for containers should be added to future releases, as this is the future of load balancing.""Certificate management needs improvement. I would like automated deployment of new certificates without manual intervention to be in the next release of this product."

More F5 BIG-IP Cons »

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.""It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost that they have with AWS are almost prohibitive. I'm being forced to use F5 WAF. I would not simply use it based on cost. I agree that they have some great features, but for me, cost is key in terms of AWS.""I am a fan of using AWS natively. It is much cheaper.""It could be priced a little less, especially on the virtual side. It gets a bit expensive, but you get what you pay.""Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was very simple. The main reason that we went this way was the simplicity of buying it there. It is maintained and upgraded for us, and this makes it easy to stay current.""It is sort of a commodity product. A load balancer is a load balancer. What will be, at the end of the day, the cheapest option or have the best performance, that is what it will come down to.""We have found the pricing and licensing on AWS to be competitive.""Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good. We chose to go through the AWS Marketplace because everything that we needed was a soft appliance. We needed something to work in Amazon, and this product was available there.""The price is high."

More F5 BIG-IP Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is okay."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Performance parameters if of Imperva X10K and BIG-IP i2600 may be checked in the following links: https://www.imperva.com/resources/datasheets/Imperva-DS-SECURESPHERE-APPLIANCE-Web092118-1.pdf… more »
Top Answer: For ADC both are very good, But in the leader in Gartner of ADC products, the tops rivals are Citrix ADC and F5  They are very good and can do the job but only some major differences to consider are.… more »
Top Answer: Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product.
Top Answer: I would like for them to add intervening proxy, whereby you can alter the get/put requests. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy… more »
Top Answer: I would rate it an eight out of ten. To make it a ten, I would like for there to be more flexibility for the testers.
Ranking
Views
46,481
Comparisons
36,036
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
432
Avg. Rating
8.0
20th
Views
2,132
Comparisons
1,842
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
334
Avg. Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
Learn
F5
Tenable Network Security
Overview
The BIG-IP family of products offers the application intelligence that network managers need to ensure applications are fast, secure, and available. All BIG-IP products share a common underlying architecture, F5's Traffic Management Operating System (TMOS), which provides unified intelligence, flexibility, and programmability. Together, BIG-IP's powerful platforms, advanced modules, and centralized management system make up the most comprehensive set of application delivery tools in the industry.

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Offer
Learn more about F5 BIG-IP
Learn more about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Sample Customers
Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.IMDEX
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Comms Service Provider21%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government8%
Healthcare Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise59%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise55%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
F5 BIG-IP is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers with 23 reviews while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is ranked 20th in Application Security with 2 reviews. F5 BIG-IP is rated 8.2, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP writes "It could be hard to scale because we will be encrypting and decrypting. The connection through the API Gateway worked in no time, which was fantastic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning writes "Good reporting and integration, but it needs a user-friendly dashboard". F5 BIG-IP is most compared with Citrix ADC, HAProxy, Fortinet FortiWeb, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and NGINX Plus, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is most compared with PortSwigger Burp, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner, Checkmarx, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand and ImmuniWeb.

See our list of .

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.