We performed a comparison between F5 Shape Security and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of configuration."
"F5 Shape Security's most valuable feature is performance."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"It is an effective threat mitigation tool."
"It fits our requirements, as well as our budget."
"There are quite a few useful Imperva Incapsula features. For example, one of them is the reports. The graphics are very good and it's easy to configure. The whole process is very fast and reliable too. They have good tech support as well."
"An improvement has been to our website: It increases the speed of our response, the capacity of the site, and optimizes the bandwidth."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"Provides Anti-DDoS protection, as well as other protections like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting, and antiscanner. These types of protection are valuable to the business due to the daily attacks on our portals, and that often cannot be seen without a tool like this."
"The tool's price is high."
"I want the solution's custom exclusion rules to be more granular."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"Certificate management could be improved."
"The product could use a broader scope in the area of policies."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"Imperva always needs to adjust to new versions of cyber attacks, it needs to be faster, improve the resiliency of the software of the solution."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
F5 Shape Security is ranked 7th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 2 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 6th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews. F5 Shape Security is rated 8.6, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of F5 Shape Security writes "Easy to configure and blocks bot attacks for web users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". F5 Shape Security is most compared with Akamai Bot Manager, Cloudflare, Akamai App and API Protector, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and IBM Trusteer, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS and Radware DefensePro.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.