F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) vs Ipanema IpIengine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) and Ipanema IpIengine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
11th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
72
Comparisons
31
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Traffic Management Operating System
IpIengine
Learn More
Ipanema Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview
F5 Traffic Management Operating System, a collection of real-time features and functions, purpose-built and designed as a full-proxy solution with the power and performance. F5 TMOS is a self-contained, real-time operating system that is the brain behind BIG-IP. Developed as the foundation for all of F5 products, each component within the system performs operations and then lets the next component run, greatly reducing the overhead of CPU scheduling.

The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

Sample Customers
TransUnion
Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization. F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is rated 0.0, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is most compared with , whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with .

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.