• Home
  • F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) vs. Sangfor WANO

F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) vs Sangfor WANO comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) and Sangfor WANO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
14th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
53
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Traffic Management Operating System
Sangfor WAN Optimization
Learn More
F5
Sangfor
Overview
F5 Traffic Management Operating System, a collection of real-time features and functions, purpose-built and designed as a full-proxy solution with the power and performance. F5 TMOS is a self-contained, real-time operating system that is the brain behind BIG-IP. Developed as the foundation for all of F5 products, each component within the system performs operations and then lets the next component run, greatly reducing the overhead of CPU scheduling.

SANGFOR WANO (Wan Optimization) provides your company with a competitive edge by expanding your business potential. WANO lets you have a seamless connectivity among offices, research facilities and manufacturing plants in different locations, locally or globally.

Sample Customers
TransUnion
Coolpad, Tradewinds Plantation Berhad, Toyota TBN, Kenanga Investment Bank
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Sangfor WANO is ranked 14th in WAN Optimization. F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is rated 0.0, while Sangfor WANO is rated 0.0. On the other hand, F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is most compared with , whereas Sangfor WANO is most compared with .

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.