F5 VIPRION (EOL) vs Radware LinkProof comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
F5 Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Radware Logo
557 views|450 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F5 VIPRION (EOL) and Radware LinkProof based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Saurabh-Pal
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution itself is perfect. It's easy to configure and we haven't had any initial issues with the hardware or power supply.""The most valuable feature is the SSL upload.""The most valuable feature is the vertical scaling of the application infrastructure.""There are several levels of module so a company can upgrade if necessary."

More F5 VIPRION (EOL) Pros →

"Provides good performance and scalability.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.""The performance and stability are the most valuable features.""The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance.""The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability."

More Radware LinkProof Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup is complex but it is manageable.""It's unfortunate that the network firewall isn't really a next generation firewall.""It's hard to scale down the solution. You need to buy another product in order to do this.""The pricing for this solution should be reduced so that it can be more competitive."

More F5 VIPRION (EOL) Cons →

"There are certain features I would like to see in the next release.""Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market.""Could have more customizations on the dashboard.""The solution lacks HA configuration.""Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved."

More Radware LinkProof Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this solution can be quite high, and it is determined based on the size that is required for the environment."
  • More F5 VIPRION (EOL) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Radware LinkProof is neither cheap nor expensive."
  • "Price-wise, the solution is a reasonable one."
  • More Radware LinkProof Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability.
    Top Answer:I would say Radware LinkProof falls into the mid-range pricing category. It is not cheap, but it is also not overly expensive.
    Top Answer:I use Radware LinkProof to optimize our network by balancing multiple WAN links. It ensures uninterrupted access to applications by automatically redirecting traffic from failed or congested links.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    Views
    557
    Comparisons
    450
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    VIPRION
    LinkProof
    Learn More
    Overview

    At F5, we give our customers the freedom to securely deliver every app, anywhere—with confidence. All F5 products are highly programmable and integrate into any environment, whether on premises or in any cloud. To date, 48 of the Fortune 50 companies rely on F5 to deliver apps that customers and employees can securely access at any time, on any device, from any location.

    Radware LinkProof NG link load balancer cloud-based applications, is a multi-homing and enterprise gateway solution that offers service level availability and continuous connectivity of enterprise. It is an application-aware multi-homing and link load balancing module that delivers WAN optimization for 24/7 continuous connectivity and service level assurance for corporate and cloud-based applications. LinkProof NG scales from 100Mbps up to 160Gbps and can be deployed in entry-level to high-end data centers as well as enterprise branch offices.
    Sample Customers
    City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office
    Papa John's, OSRAM, ADP, NYLS
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    F5 VIPRION (EOL) doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) while Radware LinkProof is ranked 13th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 5 reviews. F5 VIPRION (EOL) is rated 8.6, while Radware LinkProof is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of F5 VIPRION (EOL) writes "Excellent for internal business core applications and has the ability to scale up as necessary ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware LinkProof writes "Supports link load balance and has good stability". F5 VIPRION (EOL) is most compared with , whereas Radware LinkProof is most compared with Radware Alteon, A10 Networks Thunder ADC, Fortinet FortiADC and HAProxy.

    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.