• Home
  • Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] vs. IBM Application Performance Management

Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] vs IBM Application Performance Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] and IBM Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL]?
Daniel Tamiru
A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "IBM APM is one of the cheaper products on the market, while everything necessary to get started is included in the license."
  • "The licensing fees can be paid every six months or on a yearly basis."
  • "As I previously indicated, I initiated the IBM and uncovered all its elements. Consequently, I'm not inclined towards a licensing approach."

    • More IBM Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about IBM Application Performance Management?
    Top Answer:I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Application Performance Management?
    Top Answer:They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy. The… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for IBM Application Performance Management?
    Top Answer:I monitor business applications for more than four end users.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    52nd
    out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    1,287
    Comparisons
    800
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    298
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM APM
    Learn More
    Fabasoft
    IBM
    Overview

    Fabasoft app.telemetry is the tool of choice to ensure the availability and the response time behaviour of your application. Each http(s) request is logged together with the response times on the users’ devices as well as on the way the requests have taken through your hardware and software infrastructure.

    The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.
    Sample Customers
    Upper Austria Economic Chamber (Wirtschaftskammer Oberösterreich), Bundesrechenzentrum
    Mibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance Advisor
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government12%
    University7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while IBM Application Performance Management is ranked 52nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews. Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM Application Performance Management is rated 6.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Application Performance Management writes "A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues". Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Application Performance Management is most compared with Instana Dynamic APM, Dynatrace, BMC Compuware Strobe, IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and AppDynamics.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.