Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] vs Ruxit [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fabasoft Logo
views| comparisons
Dynatrace Logo
views| comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] and Ruxit [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL]?
Mark Kaplan
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Dynatrace
Video Not Available
Overview

Fabasoft app.telemetry is the tool of choice to ensure the availability and the response time behaviour of your application. Each http(s) request is logged together with the response times on the users’ devices as well as on the way the requests have taken through your hardware and software infrastructure.

ruxit provides all-in-one monitoring and operations management for DevOps teams working in startups, mid-sized companies, and large organizations. Using proprietary artificial intelligence technology, ruxit enables companies to manage thousands of servers using a simple interface.

ruxit includes monitoring features that cover your entire application stack:
• Real user monitoring (browser-based performance monitoring)
• Application performance monitoring for Java, Node.js, and .NET (PHP and Ruby coming soon)
• Server and process monitoring for Windows and Linux
• Network monitoring
• EC2 virtual infrastructure monitoring

Sample Customers
Upper Austria Economic Chamber (Wirtschaftskammer Oberösterreich), Bundesrechenzentrum
Sofico, lemniscus.de, CHIP Digital, BARBRI INC, Bluesoft, uninett.no, Usersnap
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Ruxit [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Ruxit [EOL] is rated 9.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruxit [EOL] writes "Best overall monitoring system out there". Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Ruxit [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.