Compare Fabasoft app.test vs. IBM Rational Functional Tester

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Fabasoft app.test? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good.
Top Answer: Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that… more »
Top Answer: If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility. There needs to be more effort made to make the solution more relevant to the application.
Ranking
41st
Views
71
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
22nd
Views
2,069
Comparisons
1,493
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
570
Avg. Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Functional Tester
Learn
Fabasoft
IBM
Overview

Fabasoft app.test is the tool for functional software test automation in the Fabasoft product realm. Fabasoft app.test focuses on the automation of tests in a way that simulates how a real user would interact with the applications, i.e. by driving the user interface in the web browser.

IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.
Offer
Learn more about Fabasoft app.test
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Sample Customers
Envisage Information Systems, Computer Sciences Consulting, Österreichische Post AGEdumate
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider10%
Government10%
Transportation Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fabasoft app.test is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Fabasoft app.test is rated 0.0, while IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". Fabasoft app.test is most compared with , whereas IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.