• Home
  • Fabasoft app.test [EOL] vs. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Fabasoft app.test [EOL] vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft app.test [EOL] and Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fabasoft app.test [EOL]?
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn More
Fabasoft
OpenText
Overview

Fabasoft app.test is the tool for functional software test automation in the Fabasoft product realm. Fabasoft app.test focuses on the automation of tests in a way that simulates how a real user would interact with the applications, i.e. by driving the user interface in the web browser.

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

Sample Customers
Envisage Information Systems, Computer Sciences Consulting, Österreichische Post AG
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft app.test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools. Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is most compared with Ranorex Studio, whereas Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.