Compare Fabasoft app.test vs. Silk Test

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fabasoft app.test Logo
71 views|53 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
5,407 views|3,599 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Fabasoft app.test? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

More Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.
Top Answer: The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies. When tests are recorded on to Silk Central, there is a bit of a lack of clarity in terms of what needs to be fed into Silk Central and… more »
Top Answer: The solution is generally a framework for test functional automation. We use it for automation of web applications for the most part.
Ranking
41st
Views
71
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
14th
Views
5,407
Comparisons
3,599
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Learn
Fabasoft
Micro Focus
Overview

Fabasoft app.test is the tool for functional software test automation in the Fabasoft product realm. Fabasoft app.test focuses on the automation of tests in a way that simulates how a real user would interact with the applications, i.e. by driving the user interface in the web browser.

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Fabasoft app.test
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
Envisage Information Systems, Computer Sciences Consulting, Österreichische Post AGKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fabasoft app.test is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Fabasoft app.test is rated 0.0, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Fabasoft app.test is most compared with , whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.