• Home
  • Fabasoft app.test [EOL] vs. OpenText Silk Test

Fabasoft app.test [EOL] vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fabasoft Logo

Fabasoft app.test [EOL]

views| comparisons
OpenText Logo

OpenText Silk Test

Read 16 OpenText Silk Test reviews
1,719 views|1,168 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft app.test [EOL] and OpenText Silk Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fabasoft app.test [EOL]?
SrinivasPakala
Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

    • More OpenText Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    25th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    1,719
    Comparisons
    1,168
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    Fabasoft
    OpenText
    Overview

    Fabasoft app.test is the tool for functional software test automation in the Fabasoft product realm. Fabasoft app.test focuses on the automation of tests in a way that simulates how a real user would interact with the applications, i.e. by driving the user interface in the web browser.

    SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
    Sample Customers
    Envisage Information Systems, Computer Sciences Consulting, Österreichische Post AG
    Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fabasoft app.test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools. Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is most compared with Ranorex Studio, whereas OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.