We performed a comparison between Fabasoft app.test [EOL] and OpenText Silk Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.Fabasoft app.test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools. Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is most compared with Ranorex Studio, whereas OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.