Fabasoft PROCECO vs Intellect BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fabasoft Logo
181 views|119 comparisons
Intellect Logo
148 views|116 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft PROCECO and Intellect BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
181
Comparisons
119
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
148
Comparisons
116
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Fabasoft
Video Not Available
Overview
Fabasoft is a software company that provides solutions for business process automation and management. Its products are used by organizations of all sizes to improve their efficiency, productivity, and compliance. Fabasoft's core product is Fabasoft PROCECO, a business process management (BPM) platform. PROCECO helps organizations to automate their business processes, from simple workflows to complex processes that involve multiple departments and systems. PROCECO also includes features for process modeling, execution, monitoring, and analysis.

Intellect is a leading provider of Cloud BPM software built for a mobile world, with an award winning rules-based workflow capability. Intellect is focused on delivering the fastest ROI in the industry, and delivers exceptional results for mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises seeking fast time-to-value. The Intellect 8 BPM Platform empowers users to create and manage enterprise apps that include advanced workflow, smart forms, custom reports, and integration capabilities. Click here to learn more: http://hubs.ly/H01Q1R90

Sample Customers
Novell GmbH, Red Hat, EMC_ Computer Systems Austria, GRAU Storage Data AG, Microsoft Corporation, Network Appliance, Cisco Systems Austria GmbH
300+ customers including American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, American Specialty Health, Baker Corp, Bayview Loan Servicing, Circle K, CoreMedica Laboratories, Dunn-Edwards Paints, DynaCare, Edwards Technologies, Emerson Climate Technologies, Enviva, Georgetown University, HGL, Host Hotels & Resorts, Hubbell, Humboldt County, Jacobs, Northgate Markets, Parkways Schools, Princess Cruises, Silliker, Stryker, ThermoFisher Scientific, Wind River, a division of Intel.
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise20%
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft PROCECO is ranked 51st in Business Process Management (BPM) while Intellect BPM is ranked 57th in Business Process Management (BPM). Fabasoft PROCECO is rated 0.0, while Intellect BPM is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intellect BPM writes "It allows for business process data to be captured in a way that's usable and structured for not just business process automation, but business process improvement and optimization". Fabasoft PROCECO is most compared with , whereas Intellect BPM is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.