Compare Fabasoft Folio vs. Hyland OnBase

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fabasoft Folio Logo
106 views|74 comparisons
Hyland OnBase Logo
3,407 views|2,575 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
535,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I like the cloud and its integrability.
Top Answer: They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.
Top Answer: The look and feel could be better!!!
Ranking
Views
106
Comparisons
74
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
3,407
Comparisons
2,575
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
444
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
OnBase
Learn More
Overview

Fabasoft Folio takes care of the consistent, secure and reliable document management within a company as well as for the implementation of digital business processes.

With features for Enterprise Content Management, Collaboration, Workflow, audit-proof Archiving and Records Management, Fabasoft Folio sustainably increases the competitiveness of companies.

OnBase enterprise content management software combines integrated document management, business process management and records management in a single application. Whether deployed as a hosted or premises-based solution, OnBase allows organizations to automate business processes and reduce the time and cost of performing important business functions through the management and control of content.
Offer
Learn more about Fabasoft Folio
Learn more about Hyland OnBase
Sample Customers
ExpertPlan
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: September 2021.
535,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft Folio is ranked 28th in Enterprise Content Management while Hyland OnBase is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Fabasoft Folio is rated 0.0, while Hyland OnBase is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "A remarkable all-in-one platform with amazing stability and scalability and good technical support". Fabasoft Folio is most compared with SharePoint, whereas Hyland OnBase is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, SharePoint, Alfresco, IBM FileNet and Hyland Perceptive Content.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.