Fabasoft Folio [EOL] vs Objective ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft Folio [EOL] and Objective ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Enterprise Content Management
Views
590
Comparisons
539
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Fabasoft Folio takes care of the consistent, secure and reliable document management within a company as well as for the implementation of digital business processes.

With features for Enterprise Content Management, Collaboration, Workflow, audit-proof Archiving and Records Management, Fabasoft Folio sustainably increases the competitiveness of companies.

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Sample Customers
ExpertPlan
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government36%
Financial Services Firm10%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft Folio [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Content Management while Objective ECM is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management. Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Objective ECM is rated 4.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.