We performed a comparison between Fabasoft Folio [EOL] and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.Earn 20 points
Fabasoft Folio [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Content Management while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.