Fabasoft Folio [EOL] vs Oracle Content Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft Folio [EOL] and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.
Top Answer:Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration.
Top Answer:We use Content Management to supervise and control document access within our management structure. This involves establishing measures to efficiently manage and govern the content. Our approach… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Enterprise Content Management
Views
893
Comparisons
772
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
Learn More
Overview

Fabasoft Folio takes care of the consistent, secure and reliable document management within a company as well as for the implementation of digital business processes.

With features for Enterprise Content Management, Collaboration, Workflow, audit-proof Archiving and Records Management, Fabasoft Folio sustainably increases the competitiveness of companies.

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Sample Customers
ExpertPlan
TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Government14%
Computer Software Company12%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise61%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft Folio [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Content Management while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.