Compare Fabasoft Secomo vs. McAfee Complete Data Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Fabasoft Secomo? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Broadcom, McAfee and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The price of this solution needs to be improved.""The price is good, it's a low-cost solution.""This solution is reasonably priced.""The pricing is better than that of some competing products.""The pricing of the cloud offering seems confusing."

More McAfee Complete Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution is excellent for protecting users from data being exploited. It's also great for preventing data leakage.
Top Answer: The solution needs more advanced features. Customers tend to not like the navigation that is offered. While accessing the DLP is easy, navigating inside of it is difficult. The policies and… more »
Ranking
26th
out of 26 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
6
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 26 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
4,927
Comparisons
4,150
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
652
Avg. Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn
Fabasoft
McAfee
Overview

The encryption appliance Secomo has been developed by Fabasoft to provide customers with a way to encrypt their sensitive and valuable data and protect it against unauthorised access.

Sensitive data is constantly at risk of loss, theft, and exposure. Many times, the data simply walks right out the front door on a laptop or USB device. Companies that suffer such a data loss risk serious consequences, including regulatory penalties, public disclosure, brand damage, customer distrust, and financial losses. According to a Ponemon Institute report, 7% of all corporate laptops will be lost or stolen sometime during their useful life. The rapid proliferation of mobile devices with large storage capacities and often internet access is opening up even more channels for data loss or theft, so protecting sensitive, proprietary, and personally identifiable information must be a top priority. McAfee Complete Data Protection Suites address all of these concerns and many more.

Offer
Learn more about Fabasoft Secomo
Learn more about McAfee Complete Data Protection
Sample Customers
Graz University of TechnologyXcel Energy
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government11%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Broadcom, McAfee and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fabasoft Secomo is ranked 26th in Endpoint Encryption while McAfee Complete Data Protection is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Encryption with 11 reviews. Fabasoft Secomo is rated 0.0, while McAfee Complete Data Protection is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Complete Data Protection writes "An excellent solution for protecting from data exposure, device protection, and shadow IT". Fabasoft Secomo is most compared with , whereas McAfee Complete Data Protection is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Cisco AMP for Endpoints, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Sophos SafeGuard and Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.