We performed a comparison between Workplace by Facebook and Yammer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product was easy to use."
"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."
"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."
"Storage is the best thing about the solution."
"The posting features are valuable."
"The design of the solution is its most valuable feature."
"Yammer is useful since it is a product you can easily integrate into our system since Microsoft supports it."
"The user interface and the way we can share and search information are the most valuable. It is very easy to use."
"I find it quite simple and intuitive. It's similar to using a more user-friendly interface for SharePoint. It integrates seamlessly with the browser, so you hardly notice you're using it."
"The integration with Teams is the biggest value for us. In fact, it has only become more valuable now that it has integration with Teams. Teams allows you to stream, so that's good."
"The most valuable feature of Yammer is its integration with all the services of Office 365."
"The most valuable feature of Yammer is its interface."
"The implementation could be made easier."
"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."
"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."
"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."
"The interface is clunky and could be improved."
"I would like to see a fancier user interface. That is one of the weak points of Yammer."
"Yammer should be able to integrate with Microsoft products, such as Outlook."
"Although Microsoft is working on it, having a centralized network instead of creating multiple networks based on a domain would help businesses with multiple companies or child companies."
"Yammer has very limited features."
"We tried to integrate into SharePoint, but it was not really efficient."
"Users need to be in the Acting Directory to exploit the features."
"The solution must be able to stream by itself, without integration, the same way that you are able to do it on Facebook Live, Instagram, etc. Streaming must be embedded into it."
Workplace by Facebook is ranked 9th in Enterprise Social Software with 4 reviews while Yammer is ranked 4th in Enterprise Social Software with 60 reviews. Workplace by Facebook is rated 8.0, while Yammer is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Workplace by Facebook writes "A scalable and easy-to-use solution that can be used for internal communication and storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Yammer writes "Ease of use and a familiar user interface". Workplace by Facebook is most compared with SharePoint, whereas Yammer is most compared with SAP Jam, Chatter, Jive, Interact Intranet and Atlassian Confluence. See our Workplace by Facebook vs. Yammer report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
