• Home
  • FatPipe WAN Optimization vs. FortiCache [EOL]

FatPipe WAN Optimization vs FortiCache [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
FatPipe Networks Logo

FatPipe WAN Optimization

135 views|64 comparisons
Fortinet Logo

FortiCache [EOL]

Read 3 FortiCache [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FatPipe WAN Optimization and FortiCache [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use FatPipe WAN Optimization?
Ibrahim Karaeesh
Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing is based on a yearly contract."

    • More FortiCache [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 15 in WAN Optimization
    Views
    135
    Comparisons
    64
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    FatPipe Networks
    Fortinet
    Overview

    With FatPipe WAN Optimization, you can measurably increase productivity levels as it reduces response time for interactive applications, helps speed-up large data transfers between your headquarters, branches and data storage and/or disaster recovery sites, thereby increasing speed of data transfer between sites.

    Today’s bandwidth requirements are out of control, consuming capacity as soon as it’s available. As users shift to mobile access and the volume of interactive and video content dramatically increases, it seems hard to keep up without adding a lot of expensive bandwidth. However, by reducing bandwidth demands and optimizing and accelerating the network, FortiCache caching appliances let you keep up with explosive bandwidth demand while delivering higher quality of service.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FatPipe WAN Optimization is ranked 10th in WAN Optimization while FortiCache [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. FatPipe WAN Optimization is rated 0.0, while FortiCache [EOL] is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FortiCache [EOL] writes "Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface". FatPipe WAN Optimization is most compared with Citrix SD-WAN, whereas FortiCache [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.