FatPipe WAN Optimization vs Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FatPipe WAN Optimization and Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use FatPipe WAN Optimization?
Rameshwer Sharma
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
10th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
134
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

With FatPipe WAN Optimization, you can measurably increase productivity levels as it reduces response time for interactive applications, helps speed-up large data transfers between your headquarters, branches and data storage and/or disaster recovery sites, thereby increasing speed of data transfer between sites.

FortiWAN intelligently balances Internet and intranet traffic across multiple WAN connections to lower bandwidth costs and keep users connected. It offers easy-to-use multi-WAN management and a flexible policy-based performance management system.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FatPipe WAN Optimization is ranked 10th in WAN Optimization while Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. FatPipe WAN Optimization is rated 0.0, while Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] writes "Easy to deploy with good connectivity and robustness for managing WAN links". FatPipe WAN Optimization is most compared with Citrix SD-WAN, whereas Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.