We performed a comparison between Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and InAuth based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."
"InAuth is a stable and scalable solution that supports many devices and platforms such as Samsung, LG, etc. It also has very reasonable pricing."
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."
"The initial setup for InAuth could be improved, as it's not straightforward. Weak connectivity issues and user-friendliness are also areas for improvement for this solution."
Earn 20 points
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is ranked 6th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while InAuth is ranked 30th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is rated 9.0, while InAuth is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub writes "A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of InAuth writes "Scalable and stable device identification and analysis solution for fraud detection, with reasonable pricing". Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is most compared with ThreatMetrix, Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, FICO Falcon Platform, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and BioCatch, whereas InAuth is most compared with ThreatMetrix and iovation FraudForce.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
