Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs ThreatMetrix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and ThreatMetrix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."

More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Pros →

"There is excellent documentation available.""The user interface, the portal, is very helpful in describing what attributes of concern are associated with the device.""Accessible custom rules with a monthly update on performance.""The most valuable thing is about the IP. They have a database of malicious IP addresses against which they check. They have a huge database for routed devices and the devices that have been used in the past to commit fraud. They have extensive historical records of all of that information, and that's probably the most valuable thing about ThreatMetrix. Over the years, they have been collecting and persisting globally across all the banking and financial services. They have been storing all this information. It is this stored information that I and my team find valuable; it is not so much their technology. If you are running it on a simulator and trying to maliciously clone and copy IP addresses and stuff like that, they have a bunch of technologies, like routes section and all the other stuff. It is just that they have something that no one else can deal with, that is, massive amounts of big data about the malicious IP addresses, malicious device fingerprinting, the fingerprinting router devices, and the fingerprints. You can query against this stored information to find out whether your app is in a good, nice environment. If yes, you get a green light. The last time I checked, there were about 400 or 500 features that they can stack against, which is pretty extensive. They give you a score against all those features for every application that you installed on it. It is pretty good in that sense.""It is a stable solution.""The solution is stable.""The most valuable feature the solution has is that it is able to do a fairly accurate fraud assessment of a credit card transaction based on a variety of parameters configured by the merchant."

More ThreatMetrix Pros →

Cons
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."

More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Cons →

"We encountered a few issues with API calls to the solution.""We are only using one feature. We haven't found the other features to be very good or very powerful.""The interface does look a bit outdated.""It would be useful if they could offer real-time processing.""One limitation is it only maintains six months' worth of data. It would be nice if it went back even further to help us really identify and flush out patterns that go on longer.""Could be more intuitive and user friendly.""SDK is probably where the biggest issue is. The SDK configuration is a bit lacking. If you are integrating it into your workflow, it is very cumbersome and very difficult to integrate. You have to understand and be an expert in low-level mobile applications to integrate this stuff. Integration should be easy based on what they are providing, but unfortunately, it is not. It is very difficult. My work has been trying to simplify the integration process because integrations bring a lot of value. Most companies don't see their value because it is such a difficult process. For integration, you have to get it right as well, but it is very difficult to get it right because they don't help you in tuning your future parameters. Because of this, it is very difficult to tune your future parameters and your risk score. If you are Uber, your risk score will be very different from a banking client that is pushing funds. These two things need to be improved for me. The rest is pretty good."

More ThreatMetrix Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair."
  • More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."
  • More ThreatMetrix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions.
    Top Answer:The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair.
    Top Answer:The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable. I was familiar with the Falcon expert language to write rules, so I had to get used to the new language used in this… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing could be lower. We are a young company. Maybe for big enterprises, price doesn't matter. However, for young companies, price-wise, it's not that good. It's a bit pricey. You also have to… more »
    Top Answer:The solution needs upscaling in terms of interface. It could be intuitive.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,035
    Comparisons
    611
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    813
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    3,144
    Comparisons
    1,918
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ARIC Fraud Hub, ARIC platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    Featurespace’s ARIC engine is the smartest technological approach to fraud management, developed to cope with the constant threat of new fraud attacks, while enabling businesses to accept their genuine customers – on premise or via secure cloud.

    Featurespace’s ARIC engine (Adaptive, Real-time, Individual, Change Identification) is a real-time, machine learning, fraud management software platform for organisations in financial services, insurance and gaming.

    ThreatMetrix Digital Identity Network constantly identifies fraudsters from trusted customers by analyzing more than 850 transactions each second of every day. It defends against data breach and credential testing from bots designed to mimic human behavior and evade detection by web application firewalls and integrates fraud and risk data across the enterprise with behavioral information on more than 1.4 billion digital identities for smarter, faster and better risk decisioning.
    Sample Customers
    TSYS, OpenBet, William Hill, Zapp, Credit Reference Agency, Responsible Gambling Trust, Betfair, kPMG, Camelot
    Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company6%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is ranked 6th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while ThreatMetrix is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 7 reviews. Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is rated 9.0, while ThreatMetrix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub writes "A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatMetrix writes "Stable with a good interface and offers excellent event reports". Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is most compared with Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, FICO Falcon Platform, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, BioCatch and IBM Safer Payments, whereas ThreatMetrix is most compared with BioCatch, FICO Falcon Platform, iovation FraudForce, IBM Trusteer and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.