We compared Miro and Figma across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Ease of Deployment: Users find the setup process for Miro to be straightforward and uncomplicated, with an emphasis on its simplicity. Similarly, Figma's initial setup is also described as easy and straightforward.
Features: Miro excels in creating flowcharts effortlessly, integrating smoothly, collaborating effectively, offering competitive pricing, and being scalable. In contrast, Figma provides hover effects, a folder system, convenient file sharing, and the option to create templates for quick experimentation and testing.
Room for Improvement: Based on user feedback, Miro has room for improvement in terms of incorporating AI for analysis and enhancing uploading speed. Users also desire more prebuilt templates and design options similar to Figma. On the other hand, Figma users have encountered issues with the prototype view menu obstructing navigation and a confusing onboarding experience. Users suggest that providing guidance would be beneficial.
Pricing: Users find Miro's pricing to be very straightforward, while they believe that the cost of Figma is reasonable when collaborating with larger teams or handling multiple projects.
ROI: Miro users say the solution offers a strong ROI, whereas Figma reviewers have not reported any observable return on investment.
Service and Support: Miro customers have been pleased with the assistance they received for technical issues, whereas Figma reviewers say they have not required any technical support thus far.
Comparison Results: Miro stands out with its drag-and-drop flowchart creation, seamless integration, and competitive pricing. However, it could benefit from AI analysis, more templates, faster uploading, and additional design options. Figma offers hover effects, a folder system, and template creation. It could improve the prototype view menu and onboarding experience.
"File sharing is easy."
"The way you can create templates is probably most helpful because it gives us a way to very quickly play around and test ideas and different types of layouts."
"Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful."
"Online Collaboration made it easy to brainstorm."
"Sometimes the prototype view menu gets in the way of navigation, especially if the prototype has a menu at the top, and most of the time it does."
"One of the areas for improvement is the onboarding experience. When you first starting using Figma, it can be a little confusing. It would be useful to have some guidance and direction."
"It should have a desktop version."
"Maybe at some point, Miro should be able to use AI to provide analysis from the brainstorming sessions or files fed into it."
Figma is ranked 1st in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews while Miro is ranked 2nd in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews. Figma is rated 10.0, while Miro is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Figma writes "Project sharing solution used to visually present ideas for different features and makes it possible to create templates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Miro writes "Easy integrations, in-built templates, and lots of training videos". Figma is most compared with Lucidchart, MURAL, Lucidspark and Jamboard, whereas Miro is most compared with Lucidspark, Lucidchart, Bluescape, Asana and iObeya.
See our list of best Visual Collaboration Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Visual Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
