FINEOS Claims vs Oracle Insurance Claims comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
59
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
62
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Insurance Claims
Learn More
Overview
Part of a componentized enterprise suite delivering complete rules-driven, case and customer centric claims management.
Oracle Insurance Claims End-to-end, a web-based claims system, fully integrated analytics and dashboards, an ISO ClaimSearch Integration that supports full straight-through processing through business process automation. It is a comprehensive claim management across the claim life cycle - intake, coverage determination, assignments, file management, recoveries, and settlement. It provides a Task Based User Interface and offers Solution for all internal and external claim constituents across a variety of channels: call center, Internet selfservice, and third-party service providers.
Sample Customers
Assurant, Accident Compensation Corporation, White Horse Insurance, Manitoba Public Insurance, FBD Insurance, Mutual of Omaha, Delta Lloyd Group
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Pacifico Seguros Generales, Taikang Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Anadolu Insurance Company Inc., National Social Insurance Fund for Employees, Alfastrakhovanie PLC, Lusitania Seguros

FINEOS Claims is ranked 3rd in Insurance Claims Processing while Oracle Insurance Claims is ranked 4th in Insurance Claims Processing. FINEOS Claims is rated 0.0, while Oracle Insurance Claims is rated 0.0. On the other hand, FINEOS Claims is most compared with , whereas Oracle Insurance Claims is most compared with .

See our list of best Insurance Claims Processing vendors.

We monitor all Insurance Claims Processing reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.