We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."
"The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."
"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."
"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 5 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB and IBM Integration Bus, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and IBM WebSphere Message Broker.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.